New Articles
Press/Media
Fox LA
Latest News
- Atty. Castaneda wins a motion to suppress all evidence based on illegal detention of her client.
- The dependency court judge ordered the minor returned to her parents after strong evidence was provided by Atty. Castaneda that the parents were not responsible for the injuries sustained by the young child.
- Atty. Castaneda obtained a dismissal for her client after prosecutors decided not to proceed with criminal threat charges. The client avoided removal/deportation proceedings from being initiated against him.
- Atty. Castaneda, after extensive negotiations with the prosecutors, obtained a dismissal of a client's domestic violence case in Las Vegas.
Contempt Of Court
Philippine News : Sunday, November 15 2009
The primary purpose of the contempt power is to preserve the effectiveness and sustain the power of the courts. The secondary purpose is to protect and enforce the parties’ rights by compelling obedience to court orders and judgments. Examples of this would be failure to appear when subpoenaed, screaming profanities in court, and failure to obey a court order.
I have a client who had hired at least three attorneys in his case in which he was designated as the trustee to his sister’s funds/estate. His prior attorney did not even advise my client that he would not be appearing at a court hearing since he was ineligible to practice. As a consequence, my client had no attorney to represent him at that hearing. The case had been going on since 2000 and involved two other attorneys. Understandably, my client was overwhelmed.
He came to my office very scared and confused. On that day, the judge placed him on a “quasi criminal contempt” charges for failure to provide the court and opposing counsel information ordered. She read him his constitutional rights and advised him to get a “good attorney because he will need it.”
The judge may impose sanctions such as fines or jail for someone found guilty of contempt of court. For criminal cases, sanctions typically are a jail term and fines that are intended to punish. Probationary terms may also be imposed. As for civil contempt, sanctions may include a fine or a jail term that ends when the offending behavior ends and money damages may be awarded to the injured party.
To prove contempt the prosecutor or complainant must prove four elements: existence of a lawful order, knowledge of the order, ability to comply and the failure to comply. As referenced, my client had attorneys and an accountant to insure that effective and full compliance with court proceedings would be effectuated.
However, even though an individual hires an attorney, the burden always rest on the person being represented. Notwithstanding that, I made it clear on the record when I substituted in that my client has clearly been “duped” by attorneys that are unprofessional and unskilled. My primary task was to “massage” the situation and to insure that the judge and the attorneys are confident that compliance with the court orders and respect for the court shall take place.
The power to punish for contempt is broad and carries with it great responsibility to apply it judiciously and only when contempt is clearly and unequivocally shown. Defendants in criminal matters should be given every opportunity to exonerate themselves. Criminal contempt sanctions should be only utilized after the judge has determined that civil contempt remedies are inappropriate. It is well-established in practice and in case laws that courts must exercise restraint and the least possible power to meet the end proposed.
I had written an article providing tips in hiring the right attorney (See Philippinenews.com dated 1/23/09). The case I cited here exemplifies the critical mistake that could occur if you do not hire an attorney that is experienced and well-respected. The client is the one that pays if the attorney is irresponsible.