I had a client recently who had four prior petty theft criminal convictions. Three of the four judges or courts in four different Los Angeles Superior Court locations granted our motion to expunge the criminal conviction. Based on new factual information, I filed a motion for the judge who denied our fourth motion to dismiss a prior conviction to reconsider his decision.
After a very detailed motion based on new factual and legal grounds and arguments from both the prosecution who still affirmed their prior objection and the defense, the judge after taking the matter into submission granted my client’s request to expunge his last remaining criminal conviction. It was critical that my client’s criminal record be “cleaned,” since he was just recently terminated from his job.
I have also represented a client whose parents hired me to appeal or have his university’s disciplinary decision against their son overturned. Their son attended a very prestigious university in Northern California and if the decision were reconsidered, permanent records of it would have detrimentally and permanently affected his future employment.
It is critically vital that if disciplinary actions are taken against you, compliance with the appeals process is strictly followed. Many individuals assume that the process will be uncomplicated and assume they can explain the matter. In contrast, what occurs is that the Committee, whether it is an educational institution or a professional administrative board is provided more “ammunition” to affirm their prior ruling. The lesson to be learned, immediately hire a qualified attorney.
Many of us are aware that employers have a legal duty to exercise due diligence in the hiring process. That duty may be violated if an employer hires someone they knew or should have known in the exercise of reasonable care was dangerous or unfit for the job. Employers are well aware that they could be sued and that courts and jurors alike have awarded large monetary damages for “negligent hiring” in cases where the employer could have avoided the harm by a criminal record check.
Expungement/Dismissal
Benefits: Expungement is a general term to describe the removal of information from a criminal record by deleting or sealing the information. It allows an individual to answer “no” to a potential employer or other background checks if he/she has been convicted of a felony; allowing eligibility for professional certificates and licenses; allowing eligibility for student loans or government assistance such as housing.
Who qualifies: Individuals who have been convicted of a misdemeanor or felony for more than one year (excludes sex offenders); those who have fulfilled their probation; those who have completed the terms and conditions of their probation; those found “not guilty” or had the charges against them dropped.
In some situations, if you were convicted on a misdemeanor and are still on probation, an attorney may file with the court to request early termination and have the conviction dismissed. If you were convicted of a felony and are still on probation, a petition should be filed with the court to request an early release from probation in addition to having the conviction reduced to misdemeanor and dismissed.
What if you lied about your criminal record? You have the job but let us assume management finds out you were less than truthful about a prior conviction or possibly losing your professional license because you failed to disclose a conviction. An administrative hearing is the venue used.
What should you do if an investigator from a state licensing agency or human resources representative contact you? Investigators sometimes lull the employee into a false sense of security. Investigators call you in for an “informal” conference to get your side of the facts. The “informal” conference may seem so easy that the employee feels that all he/she has to do is tell the truth and fails to consider bringing in an attorney in these types of investigatory settings. But what you do not know is that a senior manager is conducting the meeting and the interview is recorded and a written report will be prepared.
This scenario is similar to when a detective calls you in to the police station to tell your side of the story. Feeling comfortable that you can handle it, you go in without an attorney. The detective tells you all you have to do is be honest and before you know it – a criminal complaint has been filed against you. I can not begin to tell you how many clients forget what they know about their “Miranda” rights. Simply stated, their right to “shut up” and let your attorney do the talking. Same idea works in the employment administrative scenario.
The senior manager will then forward the case to legal counsel who will contact law enforcement. Having an attorney attend the meeting reduces the chance that your comments may be misinterpreted. The best opportunity to resolve a case favorably comes at the investigative stage. More importantly, an attorney may point out mitigating factors that addresses your employer’s concerns.
Individuals who have sealed or expunged their records have saved them from losing their jobs, to obtain professional licenses, or to honestly check the “no” box, in certain circumstances, when asked if they have been convicted of a crime. In a tough job market, any advantage to you brings you closer to getting a job.